Exploraciones basadas en la comunidad y literacidad visual: una conexión clave para mejorar las habilidades escritoras en estudiantes de básica secundaria

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1747

Palabras clave:

Pedagogía basada en la comunidad, Escritura, Literacidad como una práctica social situada, Pedagogía Crítica, Literacidad visual

Resumen

Este artículo presenta los resultados y hallazgos de un estudio cualitativo destinado a    describir los efectos de combinar literacidad visual con Pedagogías Basadas en la Comunidad (CBP) para mejorar las habilidades escritoras en estudiantes de básica secundaria. Los datos se recopilaron a través de informes de mapeo comunitario, un instrumento de análisis de necesidades, producciones de los estudiantes, un grupo focal y notas de campo de los maestros. Esta investigación-acción reveló cómo los estudiantes fueron guiados fluidamente a través del proceso de escritura con la ayuda de elementos visuales que sirvieron como provocadores o soporte para producir textos breves en los que las voces de los estudiantes eran relevantes al explorar su contexto y retratar sus realidades. La triangulación de los diferentes instrumentos dentro del análisis fundamentado (Saunders, Lewis & Thornhill, 2012), indicó un aumento en la cantidad y calidad de la producción escrita en lengua extranjera por parte de los estudiantes y un interés genuino en ellos por asumir un papel activo en los ejercicios de escritura. Además, como docentes, esta fue una oportunidad para reconocer que, a través del desarrollo de un trabajo sistemático y consistente, al igual que maximizando el uso de información del contexto combinado con estímulos visuales se convierten en un recurso valioso para la promoción de las habilidades escritoras de los estudiantes.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Johanna Marcela Sabogal Bedoya, Universidad del Tolima

Johanna Marcela Sabogal Bedoya holds an M.A. in English Didactics and a B.A. in Modern Languages from Universidad del Tolima (Colombia). She has nineteen years of experience teaching young and adult learners as an English teacher in the public sector. Her academic and research interests involve community-based learning experiences, literacy development, and curriculum design. She is currently a full-time teacher at I.E. Santa Teresa de Jesús from Ibagué, Tolima, Colombia.  

Norma Constanza Durán Narvaez, Universidad del Tolima

Norma Constanza Durán Narváez holds an M.A. in Applied Linguistics to TEFL from Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas and a Specialist in English Language Teaching from Universidad del Tolima (Colombia). Her research interests include teacher learning and professional development, cognition processes in teacher education, EFL teaching and learning processes, and community-based explorations. She is currently a full-time teacher in the B.A. in Foreign Languages with emphasis on English at the University of Tolima, Ibagué, Colombia, and a part-time teacher in the English Didactics Master program at Universidad del Tolima, Colombia. 

Referencias bibliográficas

Ariza, A. V. (2005). The process-writing approach: An alternative to guide the students' compositions. Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 6, 37-46.

Ausburn, L. J., & Ausburn, F. B. (1978). Visual literacy: Background, theory, and practice. Innovations in Education and Training International, 15(4), 291-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/0033039780150405

Benson, P. J. (1997). Problems in picturing text: A study of visual/verbal problem solving. Technical Communication Quarterly, 6(2), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq0602_2

Burns, A. (2009). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863466

Canagarajah, A. S. (2005). Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611840

Chala, P., & Chapetón, C. (2012). EFL argumentative essay writing as a situated social practice: Review of concepts. Folios, 1, 23-36. https://doi.org/10.17227/01234870.36folios23.36

Clark, J. S., Porath, S., Thiele, J., & Jobe, M. (n.d.). What is action research for classroom teachers? Pressbooks. https://kstatelibraries.pressbooks.pub/gradactionresearch/chapter/chapt1/

Clavijo Olarte, A. (2015). Implementing community-based pedagogies with teachers in Colombia to enhance the EFL curriculum. In M. Perales & M. Méndez (Eds.), Experiencias de docencia e investigación en lenguas extranjeras. Chetumal, México: Editorial Universidad.

Clavijo-Olarte, A., & Sharkey, J. (2018). Mapping our ways to critical pedagogies: Stories from Colombia. In Springer eBooks (pp. 175–193). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95621-3_9

Comber, B. (2013). Schools as meeting places: Critical and inclusive literacies in changing local environments. Language Arts, 90(5), 361-371. https://doi.org/10.58680/la201323573

Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524599

Cumming, A. (1998). Theoretical perspectives on writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 61-78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500003482

Cummins, J., Chow, P., & Schecter, S. R. (2006). Community as curriculum. Language Arts, 83(4), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.58680/la20064876

Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teachers. Oxford University Press.

Elbow, P. (1981). Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. Oxford University Press.

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (2005). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203986103

Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research: From inquiry to understanding. Heinle & Heinle.

Giroux, H. A., & McLaren, P. (1992). Writing from the margins: Geographies of identity, pedagogy, and power. Journal of Education, 174(1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205749217400103

Giroux, H. A. (1997). Pedagogy and the politics of hope: Theory, culture, and schooling. Westview Press.

Guo, D., Zimmer, W., Matthews, S. D., & McTigue, E. M. (2019). Critical analysis of research on the impact of visual literacy for learning: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations for improvement. Journal of Visual Literacy, 38(3), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2019.1611702

Hinkel, E. (2002). Second language writers' text: Linguistic and rhetorical features. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602848

Kalantzis, M., Harvey, A., Cope, B. (2001). New learning: A charter for Australian education. Australian Council of Deans of Education.

Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2004). Designs for learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 1(1), 38-93. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2004.1.1.7

Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2005). Learning by design. Common Ground.

Larrota, K. J., & Pedraza, J. K. (2016). Encouraging learners to speak fluently using in-context photography through community-based learning activities. Retrieved from https://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co/handle/10818/24223

Leki, I. (2000). Writing, literacy, and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500200068

Melaville, A., Berg, A. C., & Blank, M. J. (2006). Community-based learning: Engaging students for success and citizenship. Coalition for Community Schools.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2006). Estándares básicos de competencias en lenguas extranjeras: Inglés. Formar en lenguas extranjeras, el reto. Bogotá: Revolución Educativa. Colombia Aprende.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2016). Currículo sugerido de inglés. Bogotá: Revolución Educativa. Colombia Aprende.

Murray, D. M. (1985). A writer teaches writing. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Murrell, P. (2001). The community teacher: A new framework of effective urban teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Company.

Orjuela, M. E. (2017). Developing descriptive writing within a community-based pedagogies framework. Retrieved from http://upnblib.pedagogica.edu.co/handle/20.500.12209/10024

O’Brien, J., & Comber, B. (2020). Negotiating critical literacies with young children. In Routledge eBooks (pp. 152–171). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003116325-7

Powers, A., & Powers, M. (2019). Reconsidering literacy. Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference, 311. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv33t5ggk.59

P., R. (2024). Teaching writing in the 21st century: Embracing challenges. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/teaching-writing-21st-century-embracing-challenges-r-p-wqctc/

Richards, J. C., & Nunan, D. (Eds.). (1990). Second language teacher education. Cambridge University Press.

Sánchez, M. (2017). Fostering literacy practices in EFL learners through collaborative inquiry. Bogotá D.C.: Universidad Francisco José de Caldas. Retrieved from https://repository.udistrital.edu.co/bitstream/handle/11349/6278/S%c3%a1nchezAlfonsoMonicaLiliana2017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Grounded theory. In Research methods for business students. Pearson Education.

Scott, H. (2009). What is grounded theory? Grounded Theory Online. Retrieved from https://www.groundedtheoryonline.com/what-is-grounded-theory/

Seow, A. (2002). The writing process and process writing. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 315-320). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667190.044

Sharkey, J., & Clavijo-Olarte, A. (2012). Community-based pedagogies: Projects and possibilities in Colombia and the United States. In J. E. Petrovich & A. M. Cruz (Eds.),

Breaking the mold of education for culturally and linguistically diverse students: Innovative and successful practices for the 21st century (pp. 129-138). Sense Publishers. https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=DU2_AAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA129&dq=Community-based+pedagogies:+Projects+and+possibilities+in+Colombia+and+the+US.&ots=uySqwFSmXq&sig=3Qd6M1t_WebSAMiQcVy9iO0Oo5A&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Community-based%20pedagogies%3A%20Projects%20and%20possibilities%20in%20Colombia%20and%20the%20US.&f=false

Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues, and directions in ESL. In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 11-23).

Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 657-677. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587400

Trigos-Carrillo, L., Calle-Díaz, L., & Guerra-Lyons, J. (2022). Literacy practices for peacebuilding. In Handbook of research on socio-cultural and linguistic perspectives on language and literacy development (pp. 363–377). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5022-2.ch019

Vasquez, V. M. (2014). Negotiating critical literacies with young children: 10th anniversary edition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315848624

Vasquez, V. M., Janks, H., & Comber, B. (2019). Critical literacy as a way of being and doing. Language Arts, 96(5), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.58680/la201930093

Villani, C. J., & Atkins, D. (2000). Community-based education. School Community Journal, 10(1), 39-44. https://www.adi.org/journal/ss00/Villani.pdf

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Warburton, H., & Martin, A. M. (1999). Local people’s knowledge: Best practice guideline. Socio-Economic Methodologies Programme. London: DFID.

White, R. V., & Arndt, V. (1991). Process writing. New York, NY: Longman.

Wileman, R. E. (1993). Visual communicating. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 165-187. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586647

Descargas

Publicado

2024-12-11

Cómo citar

Sabogal Bedoya, J. M., & Durán Narvaez, N. C. (2024). Exploraciones basadas en la comunidad y literacidad visual: una conexión clave para mejorar las habilidades escritoras en estudiantes de básica secundaria. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, 28(28). https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1747

Métricas

Estadísticas de artículo
Vistas de resúmenes
Vistas de PDF
Descargas de PDF
Vistas de HTML
Otras vistas
Crossref Cited-by logo
QR Code

Algunos artículos similares: