L2 Learners’ Perspectives on Data-Driven Learning for Identifying Properties of Near-Synonymous Words: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1777Keywords:
data-driven learning, vocabulary learning, near-synonymous words, L2 learners, learner perspectivesAbstract
This study examines second language (L2) learners’ perspectives regarding the affordances and challenges of using the Data-Driven Learning (DDL) to identify the properties of near-synonymous words. Employing a convergent mixed-method design, this study deciphers the perceptions of 40 undergraduate L2 learners majoring in English language teaching. After an initial identification of the learners’ vocabulary levels, the experienced benefits and barriers associated with carrying out experiential tasks were elicited via questionnaire data and open-ended survey questions. Descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviations, were revealed and thematic analyses of the responses to the survey questions were documented. The results indicate that completing tasks through the corpus was found to enhance their knowledge of collocations. Integrating corpus tasks into YouGlish (an online practice tool for authentic spoken English in context) was found to increase their awareness of the contextual properties of words. The identification of condensed language exposure, lexical inference, and elicitation of flexible and context-specific patterns were reported to be beneficial. Acknowledging these benefits, gaining familiarity with the corpus interface, encountering limited access to search queries, and analyzing large amounts of concordance lines posed challenges for learners. This research presents the implementation of the DDL supported by experiential learning, contextually rich input, and inductive reasoning tasks in vocabulary learning by further offering instructional implications in L2 contexts.
Downloads
References
Alanazi, Z. (2022). Corpus-based analysis of near-synonymous verbs. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00138-5
Alsehibany, R. A., & Abdelhalim, S. M. (2023). Overcoming academic vocabulary errors through online corpus consultation: the case of Saudi English majors. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2249503
Barhen, D. (2019). Youglish. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 23(2), 1-10.
Boulton, A. (2010). Data-driven learning: Taking the computer out of the equation. Language Learning, 60(3), 534-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00566.x
Boulton, A., & Cobb. T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 67(2), 348-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12224.
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2004). Talking, creating: interactional language, creativity, and context. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 62-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.62
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge University Press.
Davies, M. (2008-). The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA): One billion words, 1990-2019. Available online at https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/.
Edmonds, P., & Hirst, G. (2002). Near synonyms and lexical choice. Computational Linguistics, 28(2), 105-144. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120102760173625
Flowerdew, L. (2010). Using corpora for writing instruction. In McCarthy, M. & O’Keeffe, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 444-457). Routledge.
Gabrielatos, C. (2005). Corpora and language teaching: Just a fling or wedding bells? Teaching English as a Second Language-Electronic Journal, 8(4), 1-35. Retrieved August 2023, from http://tesl-ej.org/ej32/a1.htm.
Geluso, J., & Yamaguchi, A. (2014). Discovering formulaic language through data-driven learning: Student attitudes and efficacy. ReCALL, 26(2), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000044
Gilquin, G. (2022). Cognitive corpus linguistics and pedagogy: From rationale to applications. Pedagogical Linguistics, 3(2), 109-142. https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.22014.gil
Gilquin, G., & Granger, S. (2022). Using data-driven learning in language teaching. In A. O’Keeffe, M. J. McCarthy (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 430-442). Routledge.
Johns, T. (1986). Micro-concord: A language learner’s research tool. System, 14(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(86)90004-7
Karras, J. N. (2016). The effects of data-driven learning upon vocabulary acquisition for secondary international school students in Vietnam. ReCALL, 28(2), 166-186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344015000154
Lee, H., Warschauer, M., Lee, J. H. (2019). The effects of corpus use on second language vocabulary learning: A multilevel meta-analysis, Applied Linguistics, 40(5), 721-753, https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy012
Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2018). The academic English collocation list: A corpus-driven study. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(2), 216-243. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16135.lei
Leńko-Szymańska, A. (2022). Training teachers and learners to use corpora. In R. R. Jablonkai, E. Csomay (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpora and English language teaching and learning (pp. 509-524). Routledge.
Lin, Y. Y., & Chung, S. F. (2021). A corpus-based study on two near-synonymous verbs in academic journals: propose and suggest. English Teaching & Learning, 45, 189-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-020-00072-0
Liu, D., & Jiang, P. (2009). Using a corpus‐based lexicogrammatical approach to grammar instruction in EFL and ESL contexts. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00828.x
Liu, D., & Zhong, S. (2016). L2 vs. L1 use of synonymy: an empirical study of synonym use/acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 37(2), 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu022
Liu, D. (2018). A corpus study of Chinese EFL learners’ use of circumstance, demand, and significant: An in-depth analysis of L2 vocabulary use and its implications. Journal of Second Language Studies, 1(2), 309-332. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00006.liu
Mizumoto, A., & Chujo, K. (2015). A meta-analysis of data-driven learning approach in the Japanese EFL classroom. English Corpus Studies, 22, 1-18.
O’Keeffe, A. (2023). A theoretical rationale for the importance of patterning in language acquisition and the implications for data-driven learning. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 22(1), 16-41. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.793
Pérez-Paredes, P. (2019). A systematic review of the uses and spread
of corpora and data-driven learning in CALL research during 2011-2015. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1-2), 36-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1667832
Pérez-Paredes, P., Guillamón, C. O., Van de Vyver, J., Meurice, A., Jiménez, P. A., Conole, G., & Hernández, P. S. (2019). Mobile data-driven language learning: Affordances and learners’ perception. System, 84, 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.06.009
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55-88.
Selivan, L. (2023). Corpus linguistics and vocabulary teaching. In K. Harrington and P. Ronan (Eds.), Demystifying Corpus Linguistics for English Language Teaching (pp. 139-161). Springer International Publishing.
Sinha, T. S. (2021). EFL learners’ perception of and attitude to corpus as a vocabulary learning tool. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 21(2), 106-119.
Song, Q. (2021). Effectiveness of corpus in distinguishing two near-synonymous verbs: "Damage" and "destroy". English Language Teaching, 14(7), 8-20. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n7p8
Szudarski, P. (2019). Effects of data-driven learning on enhancing the phraseological knowledge of secondary school learners of L2 English. In P. Crosthwaite (Ed.), Data-driven learning for the next generation (pp. 133-149). Routledge.
Szudarski, P. (2022). Corpora and teaching vocabulary and phraseology. In R. R. Jablonkai, E. Csomay (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpora and English language teaching and learning (pp. 41-55). Routledge.
Yang, J., & Mei, F. (2024). Promoting critical reading instruction in higher education: A three-step training scheme facilitated by using corpus technology. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 4(1), 15-142. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0029
Yoon, H., & Hirvela, A. (2004). ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 257-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.06.002
Xiao, R., & McEnery, T. (2006). Collocation, semantic prosody, and near synonymy: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 103-129. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami045
Zareva, A. (2017). Incorporating corpus literacy skills into TESOL teacher training. ELT Journal, 71(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw045
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
